Carole Bastia

image

2 Likes

Yo we got to sue them for this!

They nerf without compasiation. :clap:

You should get a lawyer to read the terms and policy first im not a lawyer and there act can be justified in the terms and policy that you agreed on when you started the game, not to mention this is not the US where you can file a case any day.

Not to mention neo NTT company is one of the largest compaines in japan and has the best lawyers and tity makers in the country.

3 Likes

Nerfs in gacha games are usually compensated . Cos if they sell something op and “balance” it later, it is considered fradulent ! Like as if devs dint know bastia was gonna be op after their million trials before release… ye sure lol…

Money is money after all !

I’m only talking about nullifying passives? You have clearly not read my original post.

In second form almost all the attack u mentioned get her to hg. Retribution and fire monsters paricularly do lot of damage. Try the same with dusy and u will see same result as with her…then what we nerf dusy too?

The main focus of this thread is on the final form but the second form is also very strong for 11 cost. The main difference between the final form and the second form is that it can be killed more easily and can’t sweep as much. The first difference is to be expected and the second one isn’t much when you look at the usual differences between 2nd form and awakened mythics.

1 Like

@Dev_VKC you know what would help balance bastia, if you let us trigger our own death revenges again :upside_down_face:

Duscy, as well as the increased number of monsters with hg and shielding abilities make DR extremely easy to counter nowadays.

2 Likes

Its funny that i suggested this passive in 2016

I find it ironic that they adopted right now just come to show how i was ahead of my time with this game.

1 Like

Yeah but it’s bad now and it would have been bad then :joy: I think roaring is what hurts the most.

I know some lawyers I will check it out.

P.S. Am joking devs :sweat_smile:

2 Likes

Mr X is right in regards to the sad reality the game becoming more P2W. F2P can’t expect to keep up.

Keep fighting the fine fight though :muscle: Even if it’s a losing battle. I’m in the same boat, but I don’t feel too bad about the game. When it’s time to retire it’s time to retire. I haven’t reached it yet but we will see…

2 Likes

Time to get over that Gary. It’s not going to happen

Sorry to tell you but you didn’t actually suggest serene field. It doesn’t work like you suggested back then. It only nullifies entrance passives, your suggestion was to nullify all passives. A big difference.

Your suggestion was even worse :-1:

Ironically and pretty freaken hilariously the person that suggested this stupid asss passive was @LemonSqueezy

LMAO

Lemon stop complaining about crap you suggested. Get the hell out of here :joy:

Honestly you can’t even script this stuff.:rofl::joy:

Maybe next time we can all be careful before we open our mouths and make suggestions…

5 Likes

Lol I was waiting for some moron with too much time on their hands to dig that out @Saitama

Especially quoting half the thread and not the rest. Back then I quite clearly state the passive should activate once or twice only, or even die!

Jesus, with pick and choose skills like that you should work in the media. I thought better of you tbh.

I’d stand by that point one year ago. I’d be more than happy for that passive to exist if if it only stops one or 2 entrance passives and then deactivates. Yet Carole Bastia doesn’t have that balance, instead it has huge defence and a very good supporting moveset.

Please give the whole story from now on Saitama. You wouldn’t build AP spam with only one AP would you. Maybe you should be the one who thinks twice about opening your mouth instead. Fool :joy:

3 Likes

Dont do nerf :))
Games start dying because of nerf :))
Better to makes more imbalance monster to overcome the old monster :))

3 Likes

I had NO IDEA you made that suggestion, I knew some moron made that suggestion but didn’t know which one. So I typed in “negates entrance passives” in the search and found your post in 2 seconds. Was surprised the moron was you :joy:
How could I resist posting it??!!:grinning:

Take it easy Lemon, don’t be too serious. I admit I left out that part of your post on purpose for the laugh. I left the link in my post so people can read the whole thing though :yum:

I’m sorry, I’m in the mood to tease. I don’t take anything you said to heart. I love it!

From one Moron to Another:
tenor

I hope they don’t nerf her!

P.S. You really should be careful when making suggestions for real. Neo Devs are like the evil Genie. They answer your wishes in the worst way possible.

1 Like

I don’t like fake news Saitama. I’m gona build a wall. Send me payment via bacs to cover the cost. Cheers.

3 Likes

I promise I was gonna counter your “I should be in media” comment with a " You should be a politician" comment - In a light hearted way.

But I didn’t realise you were Trump!!

Please don’t fight amongst yourselves guys. Also, with regards to lawsuits, the company reserves the rights to make balance changes to monsters. It’s a very normal part of a game and there’s no way you could win a law case in most situations. If the Devs did an enormous change to something straight after its release that’s probably the one case you could win. Otherwise, the laws heavily favour the gaming company. I don’t know Japanese laws on this but given that it’s a country with an enormous gaming market I wouldn’t be surprised if the laws protecting gaming companies are strong.

Basically, don’t go thinking about lawsuits. The Devs deserve our respect and money for the hard work they put into this game. When they go wrong we should point it out and hope they can fix it. If that means nerfing a monster then we have to accept it. I still spent a bunch of gems hoping to get Scorpiogeist last October even though I was 99% sure it would get nerfed. If Bastia does get nerfed I’m sure it will still be an amazing monster, like Scorpiogeist still is.

4 Likes