You will see us in the next few months played only with five stars
[image]
2 Likes
This is absolute Gold!! Don’t know why they are forcing us but the devs don’t give a single flying ■■■■ about the fun aspect of the game , this is probably a bussines structure to try and convince people to go to Mythics.
4 Likes
yes, they don’t care about diversity, just that more players buy gems, which they won’t achieve anyway
“I think limiting the best monsters over and over again is not the right way, it would be fine during rule or fighting like this in a new PVP event where we fight for rewards by doing teams where we have that list of limited monsters, people would not have the right to protest because it is simply an event and if they are not willing to play like that, let them lose the rewards nsas or not participate”
You can pretty much say that about PvP in general…
3 out of 4 people are not enjoying this damn list. Please just change it Devs. People can argue whether they are right or wrong, but the majority have spoken. @Dev_VKC
6 Likes
Effectively, it will be! But the main reason people are complaining is the fact they can’t use their favourite monsters. This way, they would be able to.
Tierwhoring has and always will be a part of the game. People always tend to optimize the fun out of a game, as a wise man once said. Running the same, OP monsters is also something that spoils a game’s PvP environment, making it repetitive.
The message of the list should be, imho: do you want to contribute to the meta being boring and stale? Do you want to make the game less fun for the average player, because you like using the same, broken strategy all over again? Feel free to do it! You can do EVERYTHING you want, but you have to accept the consequences.
I think it will be much more effective than a limited list. The limited list is unquestionable and physically forbids you from using certain monsters together.
A penalty list would put the responsibility on the player.
2 Likes
How is it a majority, when 90 % + Population is newbie in the game?
I think this list is legit way for New players to organically join the community and it certainly doesn’t help people being salty about it all the time. Most Games have a similar restriction list which changes on monthly basis. Last time it was About how the list is unfair as it didn’t contain any mythic (and that devs are favoring P2W) this time it arguably even worse.
3 Likes
rookie you tell him, a rookie may not be enjoying the game because of a wise roster and I think most of the players who gave their opinion are very good
That’s the whole point,
You don’t let the meta changed, If there is nerf similar shout starts, if there is restriction List same thing happens, its like you have to play by the rules of old guard. Nothing ever goes a full circle. For this reason Neo probably has the harshest conversion rate for Newbies to reach the top.
If you have such prized collection shouldn’t you be able to adapt and play along? I am trying to figure out why people can’t change 3-4 mons in a lineup (given that the Ranked will start towards end of month giving people enough time to test and adjust).
2 Likes
because we do not enjoy it and if we do not enjoy using what we want I would say that 80% would eliminate the list from the ranking if they were given the option perhaps more, this is not working, and I do not think it can be fixed
@Dev_VKC the limitations simply do not work you can read the threads to check that for one reason or another people do not like them and do not have fun with them
Right now 23 % of the people dont like it. It’s a minority.
Of course the execution is not flawless. But it is a learning process and should been seen like that.
3 Likes
Not at all this thread the questions are imprecise, you can see the vote of the other and what I would say is a minority are those who like it and those who want it to change, which are the majority if you give it between changing and being deleted they would eliminate , we can see the comments of the thread of the same people who voted
Most DLGZ members don’t like this. I can tell you that restrictions will make me and my members like ap spam again
2 Likes
Honestly this is the most convincing thing I’ve heard in this whole thread
Thank you for the feedbacks guys, much appreciate.
We saw growth in the last 2 seasons pvp. There were more players participating pvp event, and people were playing more battles as well, especially for the users in rookie and mid tier. The growth is significant. But it doesn’t mean we will not listen to any feedbacks. There is always room to improve and we want to observe it more in order to make a further call.
The limited list is only applied to one of the many events in the game: Pvp Arena. You can still use the monsters you want in other events. It has been proven that a stale meta is never healthy for Pvp Arena. We want to find a way to shape the meta without any big nerfs or introducing meta changer (e.g. Padrinorca) too frequently. Therefore limited list is here. Meanwhile we will keep buffing old monsters. But please understand that we will not touch the monsters that are already excellent in pve events, such as The Godfeather and Dragaia. Please understand that not every monster is meant to be fit in Pvp Arena, just like not every monster is suited to Dungeon Event or Ultimate Challenge.
We take everyone’s feedbacks seriously, and will keep improving our games with those feedbacks. If you like the limited list idea, please share your own list here with the community. If you don’t like the idea, feel free to make any suggestions. I wish you all have a great weekend.
11 Likes
I don’t like it, suggestion delete it. I’m not going to waste time arguing anymore, they managed to ruin my favorite game
Healthy adjustments are necessary. When you design monsters, you must always consider these. When designing the strength of new monsterss, I think you should listen to the opinions of top players. As I have always said, lemons do not Should be designed.Lemon is the most failed monster in your design I think.
1 Like
We can only use the stats available to us.
He insists on saying rookie when I’m sure he doesn’t reach the middle of my team without limitations