I hope this happens.
2 Likes
Yes!!! And Zhulong 
1 Like
I would like if it were every month and they didn’t repeat the legendary ones until after a few months
1 Like
las limitaciones son un pase directo al top para los p2w ya que ellos tienen míticos despiertos y solo 2 son limitados si van a limitar que sea parejo los legendarios más utilizados y los míticos más utilizados no 2 míticos y todo legendario
[ The limitations are a direct pass to the top for the p2w since they have mythical awake and only 2 are limited if they are going to limit the most used legendary and the most used mythical to be even. No 2 mythical and all legendary]
3 Likes
Exactly it is very difficult to beat a spam of mythical awakened I would say that practically impossible for 75% of the f2p
2 Likes
I honestly don’t have a solution but I don’t think this is it , maybe something they could implement is make a Island like themed pvp ( I know people will say what’s the use of having monsters then) I’m just spitballing here, also instead of limiting how about making more archetypes stronger and available which could bring diversity if Mark and mortar become strong as some stun immune monsters, if you look at S+ tier there is only 2 mortar monsters who at most don’t support each other enough( bloom can charge tricranium) and there is absolutely no mark legend insight. Charge is a good example of other archetypes bringing diversity as more people opted to use it this pvp as it’s a good and strong archetype.
Something else we need to see being improved is LINK
I honestly think only water and fire links are viable in pvp which is one of the problems in fire link endgames, they should rather make all the elements have strong links.
Not to me that’s one of the things I like about you , you bring a different perspective and open me up to diffrent ways of seeing a situation.
True, that could be beneficial to the monsters being ignored and bring diversity.
1 Like
Buffing particular archetypes is something I’d like to see done in the special rule period. As for their strength in general, that’s probably something that should be addressed with balance changes or new monsters. Personally, I think the game should be pushed a bit more in direction of encouraging building around archetypes.
I’m glad you like me bringing the different perspective.
My idea for an improved version of this restriction list is for them to do it as a mixture of “most played” monsters AND specifically targeting ones to push an archetype/strategy out of the meta. Not for power level reasons, just to mix things up a bit. For example, taking away some key poison monsters to encourage more shields/HG or something else like that. I don’t know if they’d be up for this and I like that they’re restricting the most used monsters in an aim to promote use of the lesser used ones. I’d just personally do a mixture of the two styles.
2 Likes
that is fine as long as they do not wear the same ones when the list ends, it should be that if one was limited for 2 seasons it cannot be limited for another 2 seasons for the reason that there are some like nova and padrinorca that will always be the most used What do I do, delete one from my account? Because this way they can never be used together again
1 Like
That’s the point of the limitation, you can’t use the most powerful monsters together…
1 Like
And because there are only 2 mythical ones if there are many that are very powerful, if the objective is that the majority of f2p cannot compete with p2w they achieved it ’’ many congratulations to the developers ‘’
1 Like
There are actually 3 on the lists but in the future, if they’re going to keep limiting that many legendaries, they need to expand the list to make more room for restricting mythics.
No, this is just your way of looking at this. Like others have already said, they’re trying to change the meta with the limitations. It’s just done a bit wrong currently.
a bit, I don’t think they stop limiting all the mythicals by mistake, as if they didn’t think the list many times before putting it, that’s why they study pvp which makes me think they are limiting f2p and something fresh It is a scarce if it were like this, they would not be repeated for 2 consecutive seasons, and there would be only 2 mythical and in the previous one, as if the time before this one had not said enough, or they do not know what they are doing or simply not They care about the difference they are making, the truth is that it bothers me to lose with p2w that they would never win me having more skill than them for not being able to use my equipment (I am not talking about all of them) and now I have to lose because I have 9 legendary of my limited equipment and they just 2 mythical
2 Likes
Last time only 1 mythic was restricted. There was strong feedback saying there should be more. This time there are 3 mythics restricted. You’re STILL moaning about it being a P2W thing where these players are left practically untouched. Come on man, you’re not going to be satisfied by anything realistic. The people with awakened mythics will always be able to play them for an advantage unless they restricted something like 10-20. Mythics see so much less play in PvP than legendaries so if they restricted a bunch of mythics it won’t impact the meta much at all, just power down the top spenders in the game. That doesn’t make logical sense to do, especially because the intention of the restrictions is not to reduce the power level of teams, it’s to encourage use of other monsters.
Also, bear in mind there are 64 mythics and 203 legendaries, so comparatively 3 mythics being restricted is (in some ways) equivalent to something like 9 legendaries.
6 Likes
what i see about limit is goodbye nova and scorpiogeist, infernicor and flavern, cyntia and suikenshi they can’t party together in pvp, they will meet again later in SP 37 can’t even confirm.
Another weakness is the limit in my opinion, players are more efficient in hatching, why? For example, there are players who do not have orca/angel or other limit monsters at this limit, they will give up their intention to get these monsters because it is better to use the existing combos.
Limitations aren’t a big deal, it’s just that it’s easy to get bored using the same monster every time
9 Likes
you right,limitation make me more affraid to hatch in banner or give pot too good potential monster. how can we make a new team if they still “limit” our monster.
2 Likes
maybe dev wants us to keep gems and potions…
Actually, I had prepared 3 new formations before I knew that this season there would be another limit, and the fate of the three formations has now fallen victim to the UC formation
2 Likes
I like the idea of using monsters that were practically discarded but I would like it not to apply to the ranking since the ranking is supposed to show your strength for which you have your best monsters like godfather and novadrake to give you an example and with limitations are not possible you get mythical spam and you have a 75% loss
1 Like
Imho the less people hatch Padrinorca the better lmao
But you do have a point, this would really discourage people from hatching a monster they like just because they know it’s heavily PvP restricted, that’s against the spirit of a monster-collecting game.
You know what? Maybe the restriction approach is not the best one. It’s well known that most people dislike the concept of being denied stuff.
Maybe the limited list should become a penalty list!
It’d be the same list as now, with limited and semi-limited monsters. With the difference, this time you can run WHATEVER monster you like, but the more listed monsters you use, the less RP and Rating you’ll gain upon winning and the more you’ll lose upon getting defeated.
4 Likes
this is good opinion. but dont so agresive.I will cry if I am only get 500rp or rating 
.I am still remember when I get kicked when I nearly reach top 10 .I am lost -1180 point.
my opinion.monster limited must change from 1 to 2,and semi limited change from 2 to 3.bcoz last banllist we have so many monster get limit.not like previous banlist
1 Like
I’m sorry if it sounds like a justification for players who would never beat me and I say never for is never beat me easily now, and about the mythical because in the previous one there was one and it was wrong now with two does not mean that it is good in the next they can put 5 and it will still be wrong the right thing is the same mythical as legendary restricted and do not tell me that it is that they spend work to make that list, not that the list was made by idiots, it is made with all intention so that p2w has an advantage and the promotion of diversity is an excuse. and there are still 5 people who like that post and do not realize this, I marvel
2 Likes