0 voters
Add more options in the comment if needed.
@Dev_VKC please follow this poll closely, is a very important nerf for link fire, let’s see what community thinks.
I can already see ‘Link fire is already dead. leave it alone for god’s sake’ comments incoming. But I agree lets nerf it even harder
I think she is the real problem
Agree bro
Actually, I’d point out that we haven’t even seen the impact of the most recent link fire nerfs so there’s no feasible way for any of you to know if it’s still too powerful 
What I think actually needs a nerf is tranquilizing entrance. Make it stun just one random target for 100secs and put another to sleep. These tranquilizers are ****ing everywhere because it’s such a low risk, high reward entrance.
You just spoilered my next poll, thank you.
Don’t forget to include RAW sneak attack for myst. That thing is so broken as well
Let’s not forget about having more Alteramids also.
I meant TU increase but got confused and picked cost increase lol
You can change it
Yeah, this ain’t happening
All A.S have one feature and it’s that they have solo moves
Devs won’t ruin the entire purpose of the monsters just to balance the meta
They would do something else
It could happen, but it has to be like this:
First, True Hit gets the SOLO restriction, so that Myst has SOLO True Hit and SOLO Bloodfury
Then, Sneak Attack gets the RAW restriction
This poll is flawed because it works with a biased design.
You have 4 options, 3 suggest a change. If you want to have a valid result you should try to design the poll as neutral as possible.
Like what for example?
You can’t add any option after 5 minutes the poll is created, if you have an idea to improve it, I’ll listen
Guys, instead of complaining that the poll is biased and liking each other posts like groupies.
Why don’t you step in with some suggestions to make the poll better?
I noticed that’s a trend: a group of 10 people going around liking negative answers without stepping in to help the poster.
Well, to be fair, there’s only one way to leave things as they are (which is leaving things as they are), but change can come in different ways.
I don’t think the poll is biased, but I do think there’s a way to make this survey look more “even”, which is by making two polls:
First one asks “Is Novemdomina’s ELEM Accelerate fine as it is right now?”
• Yes
• No
Second one asks “If you replied ‘no’, what would you change about it?”
• Higher seconds
• Higher cost
• Replace it
Also, doesn’t Cypridrus have the same SS too?
I don’t tell you what to do. You don’t know what to do, big difference.
Bro each option is individual.
Right now 43% or voters wants her untouched, which is the majority.
The three nerf options they don’t work together, are indipendent one from the other.
So I won’t come up and say: “57% want her nerfed”
The majority want her not nerfed.
Nerf options are not working in the same direction. Each option works in a different direction.
Yea, that’s why I didn’t feel it was biased, I would’ve polled it the same way.
People having different ideas about how to nerf a monster means they have different opinions.
Right now, it’s clear the majority viewpoint is “Novemdomina is fine”.
Grouping all the “nerf” opinions together would’ve made it seem the majority of people agreed with you, while in reality they agreed with only one of the solutions, which may not have been your favourite.
My alternative idea was to keep the structure of this poll, while making it look more “neutral” from an outsider standpoint, while keeping the options of the poll.