That’s it. Voting strongly against because you are not used to it? This said it all. I am not used to the rule either, I just feel that this is how should be.
You are biased from your game experience. It feel different? Is normal. You need to think different, act different. Play different.
You wanted diversity. That’s it.
I think you just want to play it safe, take control and hold your 80% WR
No I was just giving my opinion based on my experience of it so far. It may change and I’m not trying to shut down anyone else’s opinion.
80% win rate would be a slight disappointment after my success last season 
Barely had to tweak my team for the new restrictions so I’m expecting the success to continue. (Saying this because it’s random you made that point - I don’t even focus much on win rate, just want to have fun)
Infact I said 80% as a standard rate for top players 80% or over.
I am not shutting down your opinion too guys, but the fact that you can catch your opponents unprepared is a +
My point was that it’s far too easy to catch my opponent off guard. At least for me, games seem to feel more collection dependent than usual (i.e. I just got a 15 winstreak without even trying) and that’s probably because decision making doesn’t matter as much for this rule.
It matters even more because when you get catched of guard you need even more effort to make your moves
When my opponent gets caught off guard their team usually gets destroyed by 42tu sweeping and/or fastforward entrance and there’s not much they could’ve done about it. This special rule takes away the need for good decision making to avoid being taken by surprise. Instead, it’s more about whether you have a large enough collection and an adequate amount of s tiers to deal with whatever enters the field.
Well that’s obvious, if you have a superior team you have an advantage
Then is it also obvious that making pvp more collection dependent through this special rule takes away a portion of the decision making aspect of the game?
Nope, because you still need decision making to overcome teams stronger than you.
All I said was that the special rule decreases the amount of decision making needed for stronger teams to beat weaker ones. I think it’s safe to say most people would be against this as a permanent rule.
If this would happen, there could be a bunch of monsters that reveal the 5th slot of the team
Yes that could be an actual move
It really does not make sense to make that rule, which is achieved with that, that good players make teams to surprise and win anyone just by the order of the monsters, icefan seaguar gazer Lemon would be too dominant apart from the insecurity that creates not knowing if you they can stun protect repulse sleep or poison, nor would you feel safe or game controller at some point, really if this happens it would be the end for me
ngl this rule is literally perfect for 2 things
delete lemon your idea is ok
We could have one monster that has a passive that masks all entering monsters until it’s killed, I think that would be interesting!
Give it to Shiny Spectrefox
It’s fair when it’s the same for both sides.
That’s a much better idea. Love it.
No offense to my friend @DonT89 That is the worst proposal I have read on this forum. I admit I like the rule, it’s a lot of fun, but this permanently is unhealthy for the game.