Mind linking me to the thread i created
You should really stop lying to yourself or maybe your delusional
Eirlys has one weakness. Man eater
Risu has 3 man eater slayerbreak and stealth break as risu is far more likily to pick up a kill along the way wile eirlys dont ever need to attack
She is not an effective wall as you have to many monsters you need to kill insted of limiting yourself to needing to kill only a handful
You will not be able to kill everything you need to in time to make it have its value
He didnât say you created a thread; but you did make a post on the âwhich monsters deserve buffâ thread lmao
Edit: itâs this thread btw
Edit 2: 56 posts prior to this one
Edit 3:
Right here
2 Likes
She is also weak to remover and demoralize but yeah
Actually risu doesnt need to make any kills, she only needs to spam stealth, you can look up a video on youtube were one guy pro long the game with risu when he was losing the game against 4 other mythic
As for slayer breaker it can go both ways, she will likely to use heavenly chant.
I acctuly forgot about remover exsisting lmaoo
My biggest gripe with Selene, they have the same passive so I always keep that in mind 
Not really. I only used it against you because you so desperately tried to protect your hadeshoof 
most matches id just accelerate or purify
1 Like
Hmmm. I might top it and say letâs give Orochi Triple Bloodthirst.
Seems good.
Mr. X before awakening orochi:
Mr. X approximately 7 picoseconds after awakening orochi:
4 Likes
And i believe i said am not asking for buffs just highlighting my thoughts on her, why you showing it out of context
If you say this in a buff thread I consider it asking for buff. Same as if you went to talk this in the nerf thread, generally people would assume you want it nerfed.
1 Like
And where did i say i want her to be buffed ? Or when have i created a thread asking for a buff. I gave my thoughts about her after trying her out
And yes she is strong probably 5th strongest mythic in the game, just lacks inconsistency in the entrance
Mr X today: 
Okay here are my thoughts. While you may argue that these arenât âbuff requests,â the suggestions youâve provided are essentially âaskingâ for significant changes that enhance the monsterâs consistency, survivability, and utilityâkey aspects that define a buff.
- Inconsistency on Entrance: Your suggestion for auto-killing weaker monsters on entry directly enhances the monsterâs functionality and guarantees valueâa clear buff to its impact in battles.
- Skill HP Costs: Pointing out that the monster kills itself after three uses and proposing changes to mitigate that (in conjunction with point 3) is a direct call for improving its longevity, which again constitutes a buff.
- Meditation Comparison: Comparing âMeditationâ to stronger healing moves and suggesting a new skill like âSnake Drainâ that fully heals while dealing damage is asking for a stronger and more effective recovery mechanism. This is undeniably a request for a stronger skill set.
- Bloodthirst Upgrade: Replacing âBloodthirstâ with âDouble Bloodthirstâ inherently makes the monster more potent as a sweeper, enabling it to handle tougher situations more efficiently. This is another clear improvement being proposed.
Even with the disclaimer, âThese are my thoughts, after using her right now,â itâs difficult to interpret these as anything but buff requests. Each point seeks to address perceived weaknesses by increasing the monsterâs overall effectiveness, which is the essence of a buff.
By this logic, I could suggest massive upgrades to a monster and then casually add, âHaha, just thinking how it could be better,â but it wouldnât change the fact that Iâd essentially be making a buff request.
3 Likes
Giving thoughts is called brainstorming, to avoid the likes of shield entrance on batstia, from these thoughts that you joke about is why we have a shop, rare gems, discounted mythics, vip rewards and better designed monsters
While brainstorming and sharing ideas can indeed lead to valuable features and improvements, the nature of your post clearly aligns more with a buff request than neutral brainstorming. Youâre not simply tossing out abstract concepts for considerationâyouâre pinpointing specific perceived weaknesses in the monster and proposing explicit changes to address them, all of which make the monster stronger.
The fact that some past suggestions turned into features doesnât contradict the pointâit actually reinforces it. If those were implemented as buffs or features, it shows they were taken as actionable requests, not just casual musings. This directly aligns with the way your current post reads: a series of clear requests for changes that would improve the monster.
Proposing direct mechanical changes to fix what you see as weaknesses, followed by a phrase like âThese are just my thoughts,â doesnât negate the fact that these are, in essence, buff suggestions. Itâs like submitting a list of upgrade ideas and ending with, âHaha, just brainstorming,â when the intent is clearly to push for improvements.
Moreover, this thread is literally titled âWhat monster do you want to see buffed,â which further weakens the claim that your post is purely brainstorming. Within this context, itâs hard to interpret your detailed suggestions as anything other than requests for buffs.
1 Like
Itâs time for mr.x to underground.
A critical part in brainstorming is identifying the weakness being able to suggest improvement is showing understanding. Posting on a public forum would generate more ideas and awareness to the weaknesses not begging for buffs
Asking for buffs would be doing what some guys do on the forums do without stating their names dm the devs and cry.
Risu is either the most annoying thing ever or mediocre, not getting much done. Thereâs no in between.