It wouldn’t be fair, right? Would having to miss out on the rewards of a rank because you can’t play it be fair? one is reasonable, two is too much
It would be cool to have Guild wars from summoners war or Epic seven. Every monday, wednesday, and friday there will be guild wars and instead of 3 vs 3, it can be 6 monsters vs 6 defending monsters with a cost limit. A better, less drawn-out, version of defense of veroisa (that event is horrible because it’s basicly another PvE event that comes and goes unlike pvp which is integral part of the game and not much creativity and thought process goes into it like in pvp or Guild Wars in other games).
I know it’s a lot to ask but it would give another dimension to the game. Obviously, this not only brings a whole new system to the game but it also requires updating and correct AI as much as possible so it is obviously a big ask but some good things are worth the effort.
1 Like
I totally agree that would be overwhelming.
Did u play e7??
I too suggested that and players said no because they wouldn’t have time for both 
as if they’re forced to play lol
I disagree lemon bruv lol. I dont think that will be viable,
We already have too much on our plate with 1 pvp season., why bring 1 more lol
1 Like
Gonna have to chat to HR mate
1 Like
Just because he can’t play both doesn’t mean the others can’t either.
I agree with what you say , no one forces them to play both and not to mention missing out on rewards because no one talked about that. As far as I’m concerned, it’s fine if they don’t give rewards in the ranking without limitations.
I would do it like this: after finishing the first one, I close the pvp for a few days as is always done and then I open it but it would be without limitations. I wouldn’t give rewards as juicy as in the first one so that those who can’t play don’t miss anything and it would be fairer.
Alternating between restrictions and no restrictions would be nice. If two rankings a month is too much for some ppl, then they don’t have to play all of them. Atp I probably wouldn’t play every single one of they did that either but it would still be nice to have.
2 Likes
Yeah that’s why I didn’t used to bother with Sp rule, because there is no competitive element
If there is extra reward for it, sure.
Yeah I don’t mind a season with restriction and a season with restriction
Let’s start by making at least the one we have fair for people in the Europe and not force competitive players to play until 4 or 5 am on a Monday to not loose tickets. Then we can talk if we need another PvP event.
3 Likes
And what do you propose that on the last day of ranking they give 6 tickets in the morning so that it ends 6 hours earlier? (that way it would end at a time in which the Europeans are awake to play until the end)???
Devs were already offered a bunch of simple solutions for how to enable EVERY player to play all of their tickets. Missing the last 5-7 tickets on the last day means going down couple places for no reason other than having a normal life and not playing till 4 am on the workday.
1 Like
What I said is not a bad idea, just as they give 6 tickets at the beginning they can give 6 on the last day and thus finish 6 hours earlier.
In my time zone it ends on Sunday at 10 PM so it doesn’t affect me if it ends at 4 PM
What you say and 1000 more solutions have been proposed to the devs, all easy to implement, but it seems that “justice” is only applied to increase the cost of the mythical ones, not to mention how unfair it is to have to lose 8/9 tickets in each rank for your schedule.
I think I know why they don’t do what they are proposing.
For us the ranking starts Thursday 10PM so we have to play on Friday at 2AM
and Friday is a working day and if we don’t want to lose tickets we have to make an effort and play, I think the situation is very even, we have to get up early at the beginning and you at the end (Friday, as I said before, is a working day and we have what to play)
If they do what you say then it would be fair for you and unfair for us that’s probably why they don’t do anything. @Dev_VKC Am I wrong?
Hello everyone As you know, neomon and its probabilities can be excessively unfair, whether in banner or in rare eggs, many of the players have had bad luck in banner and it is crazy to get to throw more than 900 Gems without catching the legendary of the banner or in rare cases passing More than 10 months without taking a mythical and it wouldn’t be bad to put a pity counter on the respective ones. I would say that in rares a counter of 100 rares would be a mythical insured and in banner the legendary Insured would be the special or featured one on the banner
4 Likes
There is something I don’t understand if the ranking starts at 10, why do you have to play at both? equal? Are you really telling me that? You’re kidding, right? finish your ranking on Monday at 5 in the morning? I hope you are joking, you have a much greater advantage in the ranking than the Europeans, the fact that you are saying that it is “equal” makes me laugh a lot
say clearly that you do not want it to be changed to continue enjoying those advantages in the ranking