Or could implement 2 qualifiers per month, one with limitations and one without limitations, something like 4 days of rule, 7 days to test your teams for rank, 3 days of rank, 1 day of rest and the same again without limitations . whales like Dont and iberian among others could abuse using all their S myths and wouldn’t cry as much. PS (I really hate playing 10 or 11 days with rules like 150 cost or first 5 monsters same element) @Dev_VKC
No quiten la restricción.
Have you ever seen me complain about limitations? On the contrary, I very much agree with the limitations, the problem is the reason why they limit them, in your comment the term “cry” was superfluous, control your language
1 Like
We understand that no one likes to see their monsters get limited. That’s why there are no limitations during the special rule period.
With the current special rule, it feels just like normal PvP, without any restrictions for users with a big collection of Mythic monsters. We can use this period to see how it feels and then decide whether to remove limitations for the entire season.
1 Like
The point is that even if you have 70 awakened mythics and 100 legendaries, you can only put 16 monsters. I don’t think a restricted list is necessary at all. We’ll have one thing one month and another thing the next, which is exactly what happens here. Now Asmodia and company are limited, next time they won’t be there and they will be the meta. At the end of the story, nothing is achieved. People always find a way to abuse things anyway, and you are responsible for that not happening. So, balance out broken and abusive strategies and also stop releasing things like Zaphiramus who is at the level of the first one right now.And I’m sorry to speak to you directly, I know you’re just one part of the team. But for us, you’re the visible face of the company.
No limit list will just allow people to run the same teams with the same 10 S tier myths every single month, while the new releases will never see the light of day because of it.
1 Like
Need a sort by evolution percentage for monsters.
Need sort by unevo, evo, and sevo sort by.
Let the people play there strongest monsters, you would be surprised to see the diversity. The limitation only puts users with smaller collection at a disadvantage but larger collections are not affected in the same way
We will see new names as F2P will have a chance to play there strongest teams and maybe even get top spots.
I know you wanted to stop awakening new stuff and only base your teams on your already collected S tier myths but I have to inform you that sadly it won’t work as you planned.
I am always for the good of the game and for that people have to be forced to keep supporting it and limit list makes it happen.
2 Likes
I choose to be selective in what to awaken because i have all i need, the limitation does not affect me or you it affects players with limited monsters and you think if removing the limitation players will stop supporting the game thats ridiculous every month there is something new that shakes up the meta
@Dev_VKC where the Black Friday deals at
3 Likes
As a f2p player, I agree that they should remove the limitations or make two rankings per month (one with limitations and one without limitations) I think the limitations affect f2p more than p2w (you can always spam mythics because of the huge collection you have) That’s why it would be great if we could also use the equipment we like the most 
As I said before two rankings would be good, I’m sure many players will play both.
I suggested this long ago that the game should have two rankings, one with limitations and one without limitations.
Another thing would be a nice idea for pvp a draft something like the island pve but for pvp maximum 12 wins and 3 losses your out. The more wins you have the better the prize at the end for example entrance could cost 10gems or a arena ticket if you manage to win all 12 games you get 50gems and a couple of other prizes like pots fruits sliver upgrade material or even an arena ticket to participate again.
Lets say 7 wins gets you back the 10 gems and some ingredients thats the breakeven point beyond that its a gain for the players losing before 7 wins you lose gems
I totally agree with this, about the other thing you said I would like there to be new things in Neo, after finishing the ranking it becomes very boring so with two it is fine
To be honest, in my opinion, the only thing that matters about Neo is the ranking.
Since the start of the game, we didnt have any new pvp event, its the same repetitive all those years
What do you guys think about side team. to play against 1 person maximum 3 matches, winning 2/3 will count as victory. When a match ends, we will change the monsters in the team with the side team (max 10 monsters). That way, when we play against one person, we won’t be caught off guard. Switching between the main team and side team adds variety to the game.
1 Like
@Dev_VKC where’s scb x??
Yes, and the truth is that it is very boring, that is why two rankings would make the difference.
I don’t know the type of life you have, but I suppose there is enough free time to ask for two ranks, if one already requires a lot of time, dedication and schedules, imagine what it would be like if there were two, I totally disagree.
For many players it would be impossible if it already costs them a lot of time to play a ranking, imagine two, many people would not be able to play it.
1 Like
Because you dont have time that means we cant have new pvp content ?
You know you dont need to play all events