New cani nerf poll lmao (tnc dont hurt me i use cani aoe too)

Neo Monsters Neo Monsters General Discussions
1

Just curious

  • Canishogun and Megalodragon are fine as they are right now.
  • Canishogun with its SS active should cost 16 instead of 14. The reasoning behind this is that the value underdog gives is too much for +1 cost so +3 cost would be more reasonable.
  • Give Megalodragon RAW Sonic Strike so it can choose whatever targets it wants. Then Cani AoE that uses auto protectors can still be hard countered by Megalodragon.
  • Incorporate both changes.
  • Canishogun should get a different nerf
  • shut up duck

0 voters

lol I misclicked and accidentally voted for that option

3

No quit diverting our attention from the main thread.

4

I talked about this at the beginning of that thread I was just wondering what ppl thought

5

I have quite a lot of trouble with Cani but I myself don’t want to neft it

2 Likes
7

hahaha. I like this vote

1 Like
8

I meant to click 3 cost increase lol. I think it shouldn’t be nerfed but if it does then a cost increase would be more fair instead of only weakening ppl who use protectors.

9

First of all, I do not wnt to offend anyone just want to present facts that you guys might not know.
So Dont brought up that TNC brought their members to vote for no(for the poll he made) and as ridiculous as it seems with a tiny search it becomes very suspicious what happens here
image

image
image801Ă—291 19.5 KB

This guy literally created and account just to vote no lol
image
image

This one has his acc from some time but didn’t post anything and it’s weird how so much non active players came here like flys to vote no almost like they were told to hmmmmm!!!?!?!?!?!?
image
Oh this one also made his acc 2 h ago to vote lol
image
and this one too just to vote xd
image
another just joined
image
damm another one wtf guys
image
ok i swear this is the last one
image

4 Likes
10

Oh and also there were many names of people not really active but I didn’t want to accuse them but the guys here I’m 100% sure were enrolled just to vote no.

I do not want to offend anyone I just present the info as it is.I find it a little bit low from the part of these people.

2 Likes
11

LOL I take back what I said earlier dang that’s funny

1 Like
13

I showed them the link man, that’s why🙄,just like someone else showed it to me,since I open the forum once every 3 or 4 days.

14

I mean, the ones that are tnc members. I don’t know about the others you mentioned

15

Yeah man i do not want to attack TNC or anything just that some people made acc in the sole purpose to vote here.I do not know who did this but I won’t accuse anyone without proof.

3 Likes
16

We got a Race War between DMG and TNC brewing!

image

2 Likes
17

Race War!

2 Likes
18

I wrote 3 times that i don’t wanna offend anyone, i am just pointing the voting fraud that happened.We can’t be sure it’s TNC it might be only 1 guy who wrote to his friends to do this (not very likely).If TNC feels attacked we can settle this in a PM that I am sure we(DMG) will be glad to discuss and not create more acc to vote in a poll.

1 Like
19

We should create a poll to see who thinks tnc created new accounts to vote against DonT. Then if it gets more yes votes then we know that tnc did create new accounts to vote against raw underdog, but if there are more votes against then we know tnc used said accounts to vote against us again!

2 Likes
20

Prepare yourself to see lots of new players voting then ahahaha :smile:

1 Like
21

Sorry but that’s not happening.

22

Why isn’t there a “Yes” Option?

23

Nevermind made a mistake