I was just playing PvP against this player I won the game, which isn’t the problem.But how is it possible that his Lionheart kills my HP boosted sivanna , ?
Because he has element disadvantage and sivannas passive makes stronger as normal
@Dev_VKC I was playing this game and this player got 2 shields from F.D. but only one broke because of Azulin’s passive. The same thing happened to me in another game against Fyrelle, but it doesn’t matter.
I still won, even though I thought it might be a bug.
I have absolutely no idea what’s going on. Why can’t I attack certain monsters? Why are boxchomps a good thing now and get so many turns? Who gave a bunch of jerbos steroids?
Anyway, a decent run… 4-5 losses were against the same guy right at the end lol
That’s kinda why way back when I made a poll on what the community would like to see for buffs, one of the options was Daji’s whim can only be used at low hp, but only targets opponents or negates revenge. Either way, it might be a bit much still, since a clone daji enters and kills and heals turn one then. And that is with the balance attempt to make it low hp use only
You should’ve seen the meta last month, we got a link water FL that sweeped the field at 99 speed and made the devs rework all the fast lifeflip monsters. Go check the skills of giawolves and 99 speed stun counter (forgor its name). Crazy month
Oh we also had a 4 monster sweep (revenge negating btw) as soon as bovolcus took a turn. The monster responsible called Azulyn (she also had fermatta as revenge but against all enemy monsters, not just fast monsters, and it was permanent lol). Craaazy month
Yeah. Because it canceled a Champion Entrance as a whole. Interesting. @Dev_VKC is this intended? The whole Lotus concept was obviously not thought through since she is breaking so much of previously established combos and mechanics. The fact you can now bind something without any TU punishment is absurd.
It does say it negates the passive skill and active skills not their effects which is a weird one. Pretty sure some else reported it before and they responded to it too