⏬ Which monsters need a Nerf?

No, I am just saying that she has no mark moves yet she has instant mark as SS that makes no sense.

On your marks, get set, go.

– Prixis

3 Likes

Not buying this bs.

As for mark protection, it was originally designed for mark monsters so they either need to turn it into a more generic name across all monsters or you just need to accept its name is simply what it is. What would be more silly is if they made a second passive that did exactly the same thing but with a different name.

Well sorry but this is the best you get with waifu flavourful design. She also cares about being the fastest on the battlefield… again because she’s about racing

It definitely goes to the “weird SS” category. I remember criticizing this when Prixis was released. But the reason is clearly the “On your marks” thing. At the time it made even less sense because mark monsters were terrible but the strategy has been buffed since so it’s good for synergy.

To be played with fossildragon.

1 Like

@Dev_VKC when are u going to fix cws?? Or are u intentionally letting it go? This ■■■■ has to be nerfed to ground.

oh, so your ED team is not going well against CW spam, isn’t it?

2 Likes

Both ed and cw are just too op needs adjustments, I think devs are intentionally letting them because they want some balance between f2p and whales , thinking f2p would be the one using them , but the problems is they are just broken that even the whales are using them everywhere :person_facepalming: just look at the top teams , ed keiser or cw fellowed by the latest and strongest mythics in the game


100% winrate this season with cws team

message me back after 100 matches

26 streak is nothing

2 Likes

I am just saying cws are broken as hell and eds too.

1 Like

Rule is over it’s difficult to maintain 100% wr. I will show u when I reach grandmaster cause I have exams and assessment these days and never seem to stop. So very less time to play.

You take this game bit too seriously

1 Like

The elitism is real!

Seriously though, can we stop this nonsense on the forum? 100% win rate with a 26 streak is more than enough to show a team is strong. And I know it’s not the context of this exact post but… putting others down because they haven’t grinded enough to get high enough records to match your ideal dataset size is something Duck and other people have done here. It’s not cool, so let’s avoid it.

4 Likes

But it is literally not any metric. This streak (mostly during rule) does not show anything. Also, those who play a lot of PvP will know that after crossing 30-40ws you are getting served way tougher opponents. It is not elitism, it just a realistic take. Also, he does not even show the team, so what does this screenshot prove?

Is this a good metric to show that this team is super strong? Nope. It was just quite good on the first day of the rule.

Exactly my point, you’re choosing to ignore the metrics because they don’t satisfy your personal opinion on what is valid.

I agree that the longer you go, the more the game puts you against others who are also on big streaks / very high win rate. However, choosing 30-40 is arbitrary. He’s not trying to claim it’s a 100% win rate team, he’s just showing that it doesn’t lose against much. 26 wins is more than enough to make that point.

3 Likes

My Candy team has a 100% win rate based on this - she needs to be nerfed.

LOL

1 Like