Firemane name is already taken right? Hes the evolution BEFORE Fireheart, they have to change the name actually
Yeah, monsterdex no. 315.
Is that?
Edit… because of this,they have same name,just like they say, "YAY, free gems"
Lol!
Yah!
Yay they have the same name! Lol tengene o
Yes fireheart
I think there will be a new top 1 player… 
Man do hackers annoy me
I’d give it a try,buuut UC buff game are too insane
Only legit top 10 are me and hidan
saw you on rank 5… congrats! I am currently 140, need more tickets xD
but mophiese is legit too! I wrote to him on Yt…
Made it to 101 until now, have to wait for more tickets to continue 
Seems like the dev has no idea on how to prevent hackers and is doing the bans manually.
Yea I was like there’s no way that many people are already above 200 by this morning
i am at Level 221 this morning.,
Last UC stopped at Level 221
I think im making a progress
They banned them all a few hours ago.
I think they went with what is logical coding-wise.
It is very difficult to control an app and block hackers from doing this because the app is localized on their device and they have full power over it.
The only things they cannot h4ck is anything that is server related. They could make the whole event server-side but then you’d need a constant internet connection.
Making the entire game h4ck free would require putting the game fully server-side.
So the easy solution is don’t change that structure as it would limit people to always have a net connection. The better approach what I think they chose for is up their security.
This game is not a bank. What I mean by that is that All account data etc is server side and protected but the game itself does not contain any sensitive information. This means it’s not bad if they are able to break in and alter monster stats.
Since the only real solution to stop them from “coming in” would be to pull everything server side. It is better to let them come in and then have a smart “search and destroy” mechanism that looks for system anomalies and fixes them. This could be an automated process or manually kicked off and monitored but either way I think that’s what they went with which from a coding perspective is the smartest thing to do.
Ps: software developer / programmer here 
No wonder you know alot
Hi fellow dev can confirm what hidan said. I think the devs already did a good job by ban manually.