Ur main purpose of complaining was matching with 8 awakened mythics which means u have a problem with that exactly moreover every game is meant to be on p2w side or else why even make a game that doesnt earn enough outcome. Sure they should increase mythic cost and as some have said they should increase max cost too so u could actually use more legs with ss too in ur team. The fact that u dont want to face 8 awakened mythics is the reason for why we are making these pointless discussions anyways😔
No, increasing the cost of the equipment too much, it will only cause nobody to use super epics and epics … It is best to increase the cost of the equipment to 207/208 and all mythics with SS on 18/19
wrong. Facing 8 mythicals only denotes the reality that costs are unbalanced
Do u even know why some people use SE? ITS BECAUSE THEY ARE GD SO WHATEVER HAPPENS THEY WILL STILL USE THEM😑
I don’t think so, I have seen many top 1 use super epics like “Ahuizard” in fire link … Super epics are necessary … Increasing the equipment cost to 218 will only make the game full of mythical and legendary. And on the contrary, the ideal is that there is a little of everything, and for that it is necessary to Increase the cost of myths and minimally the cost of equipment
Man u dont make sense ur contradicting urself
I don’t see any contradiction. I am saying the same in the 2 indicated texts
Ur saying SE are necessary while saying that if max cost increase people wont use SE 
As i said SE are useful mons so they will be used even if u have infinite max cost
…
I don’t see the contradiction
I repeat … The game must be balanced by super epics, legendary and mythical … A team full of mythical is not correct, that indicates the imbalance in the cost … So you say increases the cost of the equipment … I say that will make no one use super epics, since at more cost … all use full equipment of mythical / legendary … Even worse than we are now
So basicly u dont understand the use of SE my bad then😒
Dude, I didn’t even read this to the end
When I said “try getting top 10 with only legendaries”, it was because you were talking about how close the fight for the 1st position was in the past between “two players” and I told you that the fight is truly close when you try to get top 10, when you and other “4-5 players” have 1 k of difference, meaning that in this case the fight is between many players.
But you understood this on the first shut. Stop deviating arguments like this one, like if everyone wants to compare to you or prove any kind of superiority.
And this @DonT89 is a direct consequence of what you “understood”.
Please @Exu read again what I said to DonT and the message I was referring to. This conversation is very long so I take you didn’t read everything and just saw DonT’s message and assumed the rest.
1 Like
.
.
.
Wow it seems that the game is very balanced …
The best PvP mythical has 16 cost …
And the worst PvP legendary has 16 cost …
Wow, it seems that nobody can justify this, and understand that the cost of the mythical should be 19 …
And this is just 1 single example, there are many more that denote this, how mythical people are abused in a team, it costs me the same to put Lavaronix, as Sakuralisk
@Exu @Pain_Luffy @DRACARYS @DonT89 @Laxus @ArcticTheHunter @DLGZTOG @Professor_Oak @Anne @Yakuza …
Wow …
Wow…
1 Like
Did u actually read anything we said threw out this hole topic? Everyone agrees about the cost being fishy god damn it but its still unfound in ur fish memory is it?
1 Like
And now I’m 110% sure you didn’t read this whole thing through. Truly, there are a lot of f2p-p2w arguments between Einstein, DonT and Squinty about this you said, but this isn’t what we are discussing here.
This you said is actually the solution @Professor_Oak suggested to what we are discussing.
This thread started with a comparison of cost Einstein made between a legendary and a mythic, saying mythics, as a more powerful classification, should cost more. To this most of us agreed, including some spenders.
Then I argued that the difference between 1st and 2nd places on the leaderboard is too big and, in a competitive game, the difference should be closer (supporting the idea that a cost increase of mythics would make ranked PvP a little bit better for us all), and many people agreed too.
Other arguments like lowering the stats were made too.
2 Likes
Well i cant agree more it has gone widely out of topic but to be morr precise he didnt argue about cost only since its not the first thread about mythic cost but its the first to be this toxic. A certain someone just doesnt wanna see 8mythics in 1 team while playing pvp so thats his issue and to say it out loud he used the cost issue
Well ig its a different tier list there are 2
1 Like
Well at least some people are able to take the time to read before speaking. Congratulations for that DRACARYS I see that you have understood everything I said … And I am sorry that other people with an important place in the forum comment on this without taking the time to read.
Its a bit confusing but u get the idea of which is a gd mons and which isnt
I accept your apology, and hope that you can mend your ways