Daily Gem exploits poll

Wow. What an amazing idea. It’s so good that you’d think that Zigzagame would have already come up with it. Say, maybe in 2013? And then they might have hypothetically removed for no reason and replaced it with a buggy code-based system? Just a theory, of course

I maintain that spending, say, 1000 seconds in a fight thrice is reasonable. It’s not really that hard if you’re even halfway competent, since killing 16 (competently arranged) monsters in 1000 seconds is nearly impossible, even for top level players, but it’s also pretty hard to exploit. And, if you somehow can’t even manage that, friend requests are, well, your friend

Heeeeeey less of that :joy:

Exploit is definitely the word because this is clearly not how the devs intended it.

1 Like

I wasn’t aware Neo existed in 2013? Or you just mean Zigzagame in general?

Check the categories on the forum

I’m a little confused by what you’re saying… are you saying that almost all PvP matches end with the battle timer over 1000 and that should be the way they count towards the 5 daily matches?

Maybe they did :eyes:

VKC is a bit of a troll sometimes

Wait why should pvp players have to pay a gem to refresh tix when youre taking one of my tix to get a free gem? That doesn’t seem fair to the pvp players. During special rule I ran into 5 of the “free win” players out of 13 tix one day, and it’s unfair to lose those tix on my limited time I can pvp

2 Likes

Yes. Unless you’re matched against someone who is many times stronger than you, I doubt that any significant percentage of matches end under 1000 seconds, so it seems a good metric for actually trying to win

Maybe, but they didn’t lol :sweat_smile:

I don’t really keep track, but I know that many of my matches have ended under 500 seconds. It depends on the team you’re playing of course, but it’s not unheard of to get to a Deathgazer at the back and not enough time has passed (250s) for its entrance to trigger.

I guess that’s a matter of my inexperience with the current meta teams. If that’s the case, then my idea certainly wouldn’t work. Thanks for clarifying!