Thoughts on New Update

Bruuuh

You know that Devs don’t have to do any shrine? They tested it and propably seen that shrine means more sales in gems from players who are not over 500 gems so they keep doing it as a boost in revenue. You keeping 500 gems and receiving a random value between 20-100% additionally is just a byproduct of that. Be greateful.

1 Like

I’m just stating my personal opinion, no need to come up with that “be grateful” sh*t lol. I’m not asking for them to bring it back to 1200 gems like it was before. The frequency could be decreased while the odds are increased. No need to argue over this again and again

I am by no means a big spender, but I don’t try roll under 500 if I really don’t need to. The game has increased the gem rewards by ■■■■ ton over the years while also adding this shrine. It’s way more f2p friendly now than before, it’s just dumb gem spending that makes you feel otherwise.

1 Like

Barkmail nerf hurts many of my teams. But I can’t disagree it was one of the most op second forms

1 Like

it’s surprising that no one is talking about Rhinedragon yet who becomes a mega sweeper of 42/59tu basically he doesn’t even need redemption anymore. Instead of this healed to reset his number of kills and can now kill/heal himself and reset his kills with the addition of the new goldoids. it has clearly become viable

I am very satisfied with xyz’s buff even if I remain convinced that he should have sturge’s passive, I don’t see the problem there because they have already done the same thing for other monsters by giving their moves/passives to other monsters. his new movement should be 85tu rather than 110 :expressionless:

you say it because you are a big P2W. I don’t usually complain but 100 gems is a real joke. When I’m trying to reach 500 gems I can grind a little over 100 gems in three days. The effort is just too much for a mediocre result.
Let’s take a simple case. I have 500 gems I try in sanctuary and it only gives me 100 more gems, assuming that I should not go below 500 I only have 80 gems to use for a specific legend that I would like to have but the probability of having it in 2 packs is low I amtherefore forced to save more. While I spend months with the same team, the same monsters, the others get more things, it can become frustrating in the long run. Not to mention that for those who want to be competitive in PvP it may take more time because I would first have to have the monsters necessary to be truly competitive. It’s really not beneficial at all, the minimum we ask is to make at least 4 packs, because with festivals you are sure to have some things in 4~5 packs

2 Likes

People with more money to spend than you are always going to have advantages over you, its just life. But complaining about shrine when it already gives huge boost is just idiotic tbh. Learn to spend your gems. The egg rotation every 2/3 days is for p2w players, f2p should spend more logically.

6 Likes

They are not entilted to give anything to f2p . Shrine is mostly for boosting gem sales (gem deals and festival banners are often overalaping with shrine). If you are saying you do not have enough gems to hatch for your desired monsters maybe it is time to support the game (gem shop is their only source of income, we have no ads) and buy gems.

2 Likes

You clearly haven’t been around at the start of the game, when one 10x hatch cost 50 gems and it was actually a difficult task to gather 50 gems with grinding. It literally took many weeks, depending on the strength of your team.

Today, provided you have 500 gems, you get on average something like 200 gems every month for basically doing nothing. It’s actually insane how big of a change it is.

It’s hard to imagine how you can think that getting 200 gems every month absolutely for free is in some way discouraging? I get that there’s always the thought that “it could have been better” but yeah…

The non-spending player argument reads: “I want more gems for free because why the f not?” Sometimes there’s a big spender that’s somewhat entitled but the most entitled ones are always the non-spenders…

2 Likes

I don’t know how to reply to a specific sentence on this forum but you watch your mouth there, boy. You don’t have right to insult people and their opinions, if you can’t keep a simple discussion going then simply leave.

Btw you serve it like F2P players CAN’T AFFORD to spend money on games lmao. It’s just a choice. You sound like a cocky dude.

I’m older than most of the guys here. If you don’t count my breaks, I first started playing in mid-2016. I had lots of leggies and it wasn’t a pain in the ■■■ to evolve them. Now they came up with those weird-■■■ ingredients like emeraldmouth etc. Surely some stuff are better and some are worse.

I honestly don’t get why I’m getting bashed for sharing a simple request.

The only gaming community who complains about free stuff and I’m not talking about comoko :joy:

1 Like

I was talking about the gems though, not ingredients. With ingredients I agree, there should be an easier way to obtain more of them. Also legendary potions are given out too sparsely since you can’t get them anymore from +9 legendary dupes.

I could also ask the government of my country to give me 500 euros a month for free? It’s a simple request.

Hahaha I mean they listened when Killerdog complained that 1200 gems were overkill and they just reduced it, so what’s wrong with releasing shrine a bit later than usual but increase the odds a little? As I said I DON’T WANT GUARENTEED ODDS lol

Damn capitalism is really ingrained into our souls, isn’t it?

Just read this part again

I didn’t insult anyone, you just read it wrong. I just said that they’re more implied to spend where as you don’t, thats all

2 Likes

I meant the ‘idiotic’ part. Just because we have different opinions doesn’t make me an idiot, or you.

Guys stop arguing.

It’s true the fortune shrine is free gems and is a very large amount, but also now it’s become the norm we can’t expect everyone to not want it done a different way whether that’s giving more gems overall or just its frequency (with payout scaled).

You’ve made your points, it’s enough said.

3 Likes

Must be supported, after all, developers also need to live.

Increasing the odds like that would discourage people from grinding for gems! They will just play what they want , I don’t know if that’s good or bad!