You must not be old enough to rent a car. And the owner of your account could decide to come back at any time.
How about you address this post since you seem to be conveniently ignoring it.
Youâre talking in circles without addressing any of my points. Bonanoe quit over a year ago and transferred all ownership to me. Are you really trying to say that someone who hasnât used this account in over a year and has spent significantly less time using it is the owner?
Actively sharing accounts each season to grind specifically for ranked pvp and being given an account a long time ago are two very different things. Youâre twisting yourself into a pretzel to call that hypocrisy.
1 Like
Legally, it is possible to fully transfer a car to someone who can legally own said car, at which point you do not have any legal claim to that car. Same applies to most physical objects. This does not, however, apply to Neo accounts, which legally belong to Zigzagame. However, where this case to somehow come up in court, AND Zigzagame did not claim ownership, Duck would MOST LIKELY be the legal owner of the account
Okay since you donât seem to understand if a Duck gets a restore code to an account thatâs not his yay! Everyone else shame. Do you not see the hypocrisy?
does someone want my old accounts restore codeâŚ
2 Likes
Thatâs unethical.
Letâs compare the two situations and see how different they are:
Someone is given restore code for an account that wasnât initially theirs and then used it to play all pve events, offline/online missions, unranked pvp, and unranked pvp while no one else used it.
At least three people are using the same account to rotate playing each season to grind ranked pvp and get on the leaderboards because the owner doesnât have the time to play himself.
Similarities
- an account was given to someone else to play with. I think itâs clear that both of us have no issue with this act alone.
Differences
-
In the first situation, the original owner of the account quit and gave it to a player who is now the only one using it. This doesnât even count as sharing, while the other situation has three players rotating the accounts each season because the original owner doesnât have time to play during ranked pvp.
-
The intent is also noticeably different. The owner in the first situation quit the game completely and gave it to a friend to use since he didnât want to waste the account. The owner in the second situation still uses the account but is sharing it with other people so his account still gets a top spot on the leaderboard when heâs not playing.
Saying that the only reason the account in the second situation is being shared is so that f2ps can experiment with a much larger collection is a joke since I did the same thing in the past without interfering with ranked pvp at all.
Unless Iâm wrong about the differences, I think it was accurate of me to say that you ignoring huge distinctions between me and the account sharers to point out hypocrisy without actually addressing my post at the top of this thread.
EDIT: just for clarification since youâll probably ignore this again, transferring accounts to someone else is not something I consider unethical. Sharing accounts each month to gain a huge advantage in pvp is quite unethical. There is nothing hypocritical about my opinion.
4 Likes
No matter how you want to cut the pizza at the end of the day youâre still benefiting from the work of others as the account is not originally yours.
If your girlfriend has another guyâs kid No matter how long you raise it itâll never be your baby.
I agree with you. I say they have so much energy to compete for the first place every time. Itâs very tired to compete for the top ten and the first place 
3 Likes
The fact that you guys think we share accounts to rank high is the real funny part DMG could fill up the top 10 if we really wanted to without sharing a thing.
And the fact that Iâm arguing with someone who is using an account that isnât theirs is hilarious
Did you even read Duckâs post?
Honestly I stopped reading after this part because his assumption is wrong.
So basically, you read none of his post
Well the base of his argument is incorrect so why continue reading?
Again, I donât see anything unethical about what I did. That doesnât conflict with my original take on this anyway so why is it significant? No hypocrisy to be found 
Thatâs quite irrelevant since half the DMG members in the top 10 at the moment are using shared accounts.
Daniel, Anna, and Broly.
Reading comprehension must not be his strong suit. Either that or he just keeps deflecting to other points that donât matter.
2 Likes
Whatâs wrong? You can testify and argue
I hate to question your integrity, but if DMG doesnât share accounts to gain an advantage, how do you explain the fact that the devs, who have logs of PvP and account transfers, interfered to stop a DMG member from abusing account rotation?
2 Likes
He wasnât a part of DMG when that happened.
Iâm sorry I donât understand what you mean can you explain?