What did you get from your Eggs? (Part 2)

Neo Monsters Neo Monsters General Discussions
4995

:red_exclamation_mark:Another interesting fact​:red_exclamation_mark:

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but some accounts in the game have a certain peculiarity that others don’t.

Some accounts are good at obtaining Legendary monsters more easily than others from the very beginning.

Other accounts have better luck awakening Mythic monsters, meaning when it comes to obtaining Mythic shards.

And others are simply terrible at everything from the start, meaning they have bad luck from the beginning, hahaha.

For example, my main account, which is the one I currently have, went a year without even awakening a single Mythic monster, but the following year I awakened 7 Mythic monsters, and this past anniversary I managed to collect 5300 gems since July, when I started collecting, and awakened 6 Mythic monsters. One of them was Astralis, which wasn’t part of the anniversary, but its banner ended when the anniversary started, and I didn’t miss the opportunity to take the risk.

It cost me 2600 gems to awaken Astralis from scratch without having gathered any fragments beforehand.

Getting back to the topic, the first thing you need to know is what kind of account you have. Some years your account has no luck at all, but then another year everything can change.

Neo is a very beautiful and contradictory game; it’s worth studying it and drawing your own conclusions as a player, but this only comes with time, gaining experience, and making all sorts of comparisons.

At least that’s how I’ve done it, and it’s always

worked for me.

1 Like
4996

I technically awakened Whitara in about 1k gems.

800 upon release and 200 with the anniversary banner for the last shard.

The rule I follow is the same as what happens when a bkackjack table is “cold”. If the hatches suck, stop hatching and come back later.

2 Likes
4997

I follow the rule “if I don’t hatch now I can’t get what I want until 3 months has passed” xD

Superstition. All of it. It’s your subjective perception.

Those are not a facts. Just setting it straight. And I don’t want any more defensive comments from now on.

1 Like
4998

Of course, of course.

Your word is the one that counts.

You’re absolutely righ.

4999

I completely understand.

In my country, the internet connection isn’t very good, so of course that makes a difference.

A stable connection is not the same as an unstable internet connection.

I’ve done the same thing: I make four 40-gem pulls, and if my luck is terrible, I wait for another time to spend the rest of the gems; maybe my luck will change.

A timely retreat is a victory.

At first, I swam against the current, but then I learned that when the tide is high, it’s best not to jump in to avoid the consequences.

5000

What would you say if I said: it’s a fact that the cows are flying?

5001

You might be talking about Milgon.

1 Like
5002

I’d say that’s a superstition.

But being superstitious is one thing, and being ignorant is quite another.

1 Like
5003

They’re not mutually exclusive

5004

In the 18th century, the Catholic Church itself stated that the Earth was flat and rested on five elephants, which in turn were riding on top of a giant turtle.

A philosopher appeared at that time—I can’t quite recall his name—who said that the Earth was round and revolved around the Sun. This philosopher was accused of heresy and superstition.

In the end, many years later, they had to admit he was right.

He was surrounded by ignorant people, and the churches didn’t want anyone to contradict their beliefs because if they did, then it wasn’t the word of God who had uttered such nonsense as the Earth being flat.

It suits ignorant people for everyone else to be ignorant like themselves because it makes manipulating the masses much easier.

The Church, or rather its leaders, were arrogant and wouldn’t accept any truth other than their own. You can present an ignorant person with a lot of evidence, but in the end they will remain ignorant, so the best thing to do is to leave them in their ignorance and not waste energy on them.

1 Like
5006

Thank you for a random unrelated story to the discussion that I didn’t read. Anyway, the devs most likely have logs of all hatches, and I’m willing to bet they add up correctly. But these statements all sound like good/bad luck bias; if you didn’t log every single hatch you did then your argument has nothing to back it.

2 Likes
5007

51149
51149735×723 72 KB

5008

The anecdote is relevant to the discussion.

It touches on the topic of ignorant and superstitious people.

Regarding the original topic, I never claimed it was 100% valid, and I made that very clear in the post, but it has a good chance of being true.

On the other hand, I could gather a mountain of evidence if I wanted to, but I don’t think it’s worth it because in the end, no matter how much evidence I gather, it will be refuted, and it’s not worth wasting energy on it because, let’s be clear, nothing will be achieved.

5009

That’s why it’s best to leave the ignorant in their ignorance, and if they say something is green, then it’s green, end of story.

Anyway, I gain nothing by saying the opposite; quite the contrar.

5010

images
images415×739 37.6 KB

1 Like
5011

:joy:,jajaja.

5012

Well then don’t make claims you’re not willing to back and save time, easy as that :+1:t2:

1 Like
5013

Another day in the forum seeing an argument over superstition and facts…ahh, fight…:right_facing_fist::left_facing_fist::upside_down_face:

5014

I repeat, I never claimed it was 100% true, thus preventing this.

But you can’t know for sure because, as you wrote in one of your posts above, you didn’t even read the discussion thread from the beginning, yet you’re giving your opinion without even having read the entire conversation first.

5015

I did read the conversation tho, but stopped the moment you brought up religion…

That being said: I am data driven, and if you are not going to back up your claims with real data, there’s nothing to discuss :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Likes