It must be.
On the other hand I still would not like to be directly punished for not having it yet.
1 Like
I entered thinking this is āmotarā thread. Sorry !
1 Like
@Zardecil instead of taking jabs at paying players, why donāt you go out and better your own financial situation. Find a higher paying job. Further your financial education. Thereās lots of things you can do (PM me and Iād be happy to help you with your finances).
People with money win in the real world too, not just in Neo. Life lesson.
1 Like
Oh believe me I already know what I am doing. Thatās why I have no disposable income to spend on neo, because of the start of a long term plan for that.
If you look at my comment, I was only reacting to you suggesting a mode that is purely beneficial to the playerbase with the most money. It would shut me out of that pvp season. That is directly against why I play this game.
Instead of taking offense at my comment on how unbalanced that sort of pvp would be, why donāt you consider that not everyone is you and has the resources to spend on the game. As such the modes released should not favor the top 1% spending side of the playerbase.
1 Like
Please letās not take offence to anything. Any change to max team cost should be for the benefit of the game itself, not any particular group or simply as a community request. I think if mythics become a large part of the game then perhaps a rise in team cost could be sensible but if the idea is to make us use a mixture of monster qualities then 206 is working well.
1 Like
Instead of telling yourself that you CANāT afford gems, ask yourself HOW you can afford to buy gems.
Capitalism is Godās way of determining who is smart and who is poor.
That being said, to get this thread back on topic after @Zardecil derailed it, take a look at the most significant updates Devs implemented:
- Secret Skills = More Cost
- Revival of Link = Need to use more legends to make this work because there isnāt a lot of Epic/SE support, ie more cost
- Mythic monsters = More Cost
Itās the direction the game is going, I think more team cost is inevitable. Why not give us unlimited team cost except for ranked pvp?
Gary, a bit too far. Donāt get personal with other peopleā¦ we all have our own lives, incomes and priorities.
I feel like more team cost is inevitable too. If the Devs was mythics to be played itās what they will do.
Answer to that is āwait precisely 2 years for my stuff to have time to work itself outā. You derailed the thread lol.
1 Like
Lol. āYou derailed the threadā
Itās like when one of my kids gets out of bed to tell me the other one is out of bed. Uhm, youāre doing the same thing right now, bro.
2 Likes
Rich countries can only exist on the shoulders of poor countries. Thats the way if your āGodā.
Keeping the poor people poor to benefit the rich guys. That has nothing to do with beeing smart
1 Like
To be into the topic. Lets make 2 seperate pvps. One pvp with no limit and the other pvp with 206. At the end the top 3 of both fight against each other. Thats the way to see who is smart and who only got a big wallet
Wow that is the most condescending thing Iāve read in this forum.
Itās not a āsmartā way to make a point. You need to relax.
In regards to team cost. I think 208 would be perfect, but happy with 206.
1 Like
Apparently no one in this forum knows who Ron Swanson is
2 Likes
Hahaha yeah parks and recreation
1 Like
Notice the top of the pyramid regarding honor. This is my sentiment exactly toward BB Spammers
2 Likes
Whether something is a quote or not, it doesnāt change how it might come across. Also, respect that this game and forum is global so only a small number of people will have seen an American TV show.
Letās please keep this thread on topic, otherwise it will be closed.
1 Like
Lochi and I got it. And weāre the most important people in the world.
1 Like
@Lucrayzor more like @Lurkrayzor
1 Like
Nice job gary, you managed to necro a thread that was made 6 months ago.
Whatever you had to say was not worth doing this.