The DEVs strive to give us good monsters and immediately there are people who start to complain and compare it with the reasons, please be more reasonable. @Dev_VKC Thank you for the work you do, there are always those who will not agree with everything you do, I understand that it is a game that is extremely difficult to keep in balance due to the large number of monsters skills and strategies you have. I’ve been playing this game for 6 years and it’s great that I still like it like I did from day one. The game has evolved a world, it is good that it is not left behind, I would just love to see more mythical monsters instead of half-naked girls, at that point I think the game has been lost a bit ‘the touch’ of the game.
[quote=“squinty1880, post:11, topic:41612”]
Es una comparación directa con otra cosa que en el papel debería ser más fuerte y que tiene un movimiento idéntico
[/quot I see no reason to compare a mythical with a legendary. In another forum I also compared angelion with mechangelion, one thing has nothing to do with the other
Ya know, stats do play a part in the comparison here. We are comparing a 6 star and 7 star monster that happen to have two of the same skills with different TUs. What might be the reason? What are the stats/passives/other moves that might sway the difference here?
Sivanna is extremely strong as is, with a slander she has her escalation charged with a move that ignores revenge. For me that is more than enough. In the description of mythicals he doesn’t necessarily say that they should be stronger than legends, they just have higher stats and at least one unique ability. Sivanna is obviously far superior in skill set, she just has less speed.