I won one or two Armageddon tournaments, I donât remember exactly, watch out!
Unholy_Prem Youâre The Beast!
Perhaps, but Mr. X was one of the best players of the old school, and in that era, among active players, none can even come close to his past achievements.So that technically makes him the âGOATâ
I know this might hurt some people, but itâs a fact.
Stupid AI haha
remember the African shaman thread FIND YOUR LOVE , as a NEOMONSTERS PLAYER , CONTACT +6969420420
Thanks but some players want to deny it, honestly pvp back than was significantly harder than now, the best players that played the game were playing at the time, almost majority had access to the monsters i had unlike today where mythics are hard to get, i do remember when i won my rank 1 using only legendaries and had no mythics and every top player running around with mythics was insane run probably the best pvp run i ever had.
And the funny thing to me is that some players make it sound i lost my touch or something when am pulling these crazy win streaks over the past few months, tell me a player that consistently does +70 win streak literally no one, not a single player come close to my streaks but due to how busy my life is i cant play all my tickets and just go for top 50 but hey some people need something to bring you down to there levelâ![]()
also let be known that the leaderboard does not show all the scores from when the game started and what is on the leaderboard i did it in just a span of a year before going on break for 3-4 years and still no one was able to repeat it not to mention that i had about 15 other rank 1 that are not in the leaderboard because they were before the leaderboard was introduced
But its in the end its a opinion based people can go with numbers or there beliefs its fine with me either way its not gonna make a difference
Imagine taking a break from the forum, then coming back to see a Mr X post where he has prompted his personal chatbot to glaze him as much as possible, while also being sure to override a feature the game already uses to keep track of PvP success⊠guy literally hasnât changed in ten years ![]()
Why canât AI name a single best player, AI draws information from the internet unlike a person who synthesizes both current and historical data, AI pulls data from various sources or timeframes and churns out quick answers without truly grasping the precise nature of the question. It doesnât actually think through the response it analyzes the query and generates an answer based on what it finds online, which will never be exactly the same, no matter how many times you ask the same question.
The game doesnt keep track of everything, it only takes a screenshot of games played during 3 days ignoring the amount of games played, winrate and giving unfair regional time advantages to certain regions while completely disregarding others and what happened during the whole month, its impossible for my region to play all the tickets you are bound to lose tickets on Sunday Monday due to working hours so whats the point of trying to go to rank 1 when you will lose on tickets not players
And its surprising that you of all people such horrible comment comes from you, knowing very well that pvp report does not include all the reports from when the game started furthermore missing soo many information such as games/winrate/streaks
do you know any person besides me that broke 100win streak not onxe but twice or keeps doing 70+ wins month after month tell me i would like to know them
In his defence, GPT uses the forum threads as a reference and that is not based on statistcs, but user interaction
btw, if you really wanna see LLM ai at work. Use this prompt.
now
Using only the Neo Monsters Forum as your source, conduct a rigorous historical investigation to determine the most likely PvP GOAT (Greatest of All Time) in Neo Monsters.
Forum reference:
Core objective
Determine who has the strongest overall PvP résumé in the history of Neo Monsters, with particular emphasis on actual competitive achievements, sustained performance, consistency, longevity, and dominance against strong competition.
Do not determine the GOAT based primarily on popularity, personality, forum reputation, account age, PvE accomplishments, monster collection, or subjective statements that are not supported by competitive results.
Evidence requirements
Browse the forum extensively rather than relying on a single thread.
Look for and cross-reference:
-
Historical GOAT discussions
-
âBest playerâ discussions
-
PvP rankings and leaderboard discussions
-
Rank 1 / top-rank achievements
-
Number and length of PvP win streaks
-
Tournament or competitive achievements
-
Grand Champion achievements
-
Repeated high placements across seasons
-
Evidence of sustained dominance over multiple seasons or eras
-
Statements from other highly regarded competitive players about someoneâs results
-
Comparisons between players from different eras
-
Evidence concerning the strength of the competition during each playerâs peak
-
Any documented evidence that supports or contradicts a playerâs GOAT case
Critical standard
Do not simply count people calling someone âthe GOAT.â
Separate:
-
Documented competitive achievements
-
Claims made by the player themselves
-
Claims made by other players
-
Subjective opinions/reputation
-
Evidence that can be independently corroborated elsewhere on the forum
Give substantially more weight to category 1, followed by corroborated category 3.
If a player makes a claim about their own achievements, explicitly label it as self-reported unless other forum evidence corroborates it.
Era adjustment
Neo Monsters PvP has changed substantially over time.
Account for differences between eras, including changes to:
-
PvP systems
-
matchmaking
-
ranking structures
-
available monsters
-
metas
-
player populations
-
competitive formats
-
Legendary/Mythic eras
-
modern PvP systems
Do not automatically assume that a modern achievement is superior to an older achievement simply because it is newer.
Conversely, do not automatically glorify older players because they are historically famous.
Evaluate how difficult the achievement appears to have been within its own competitive environment.
Important distinction
Separate these concepts:
-
Best player at their peak
-
Most dominant player during a particular era
-
Most strategically skilled player
-
Most accomplished player
-
Best overall PvP résumé
-
Greatest of All Time
The final GOAT determination should primarily follow the overall résumé, not merely peak skill.
Player-by-player investigation
For every serious GOAT candidate, provide:
-
Their strongest documented PvP achievements
-
Their strongest evidence of sustained dominance
-
Their strongest evidence of peak performance
-
Their longevity at the top
-
Quality of competition they faced, where the forum provides evidence
-
Evidence from other respected players
-
Weaknesses or limitations in their GOAT case
-
Whether their achievements are documented, corroborated, self-reported, or primarily anecdotal
Pay particular attention to historically prominent candidates whose forum record warrants inclusion.
Do not force these names into the ranking if the evidence does not support them.
Anti-bias requirement
Be genuinely neutral.
Do not select a player simply because the investigation is expected to favor him.
However, also do not artificially manufacture a âtieâ simply to appear balanced.
If the evidence produces a clear winner, state that clearly.
If another player has a stronger case under a particular criterion, explicitly acknowledge that without allowing that criterion to overshadow the overall résumé unless warranted.
Final verdict
Produce:
1. The suspected GOAT
State the player clearly and unambiguously.
2. The evidence-based case
Explain why their résumé is stronger than the alternatives.
3. A ranked shortlist
Rank the strongest 5â10 candidates and give each a concise explanation.
4. GOAT scorecard
Compare the leading candidates across:
| Players to consider | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sustained dominance | |||||
| Peak performance | |||||
| Rank 1/top placements | |||||
| Win streaks | |||||
| Longevity | |||||
| Strength of competition | |||||
| Cross-era résumé | |||||
| Independent corroboration | |||||
| Overall PvP résumé |
Use qualitative ratings such as Exceptional / Very Strong / Strong / Moderate / Limited, and explain any contentious rating.
Most important conclusion
End with a section titled:
Why the GOAT winner beats the closest challenger
Directly compare the #1 candidate against the single strongest alternative.
Explain what the winner has that the challenger does not, and whether the difference is:
-
sustained dominance,
-
greater longevity,
-
more top finishes,
-
stronger win-streak record,
-
broader cross-era success,
-
stronger corroboration,
-
or a combination of these.
Do not hide behind âit dependsâ if the totality of the forum evidence favors one player.
Source discipline
The Neo Monsters Forum must be the only source.
Do not use Reddit, Discord, YouTube, Google snippets, social media, wikis, or external websites to establish achievements.
You may use multiple threads from the Neo Monsters Forum, including older archived discussions and newer discussions.
For every important factual claim, identify the relevant forum thread and explain what evidence it contributes.
The objective is not to produce the most diplomatic answer.
The objective is to determine, as rigorously as the available forum evidence allows:
Who has the strongest documented claim to being the PvP GOAT in Neo Monsters history, and why?
This thread feels silly now
It was pretty silly to start lol

From a fun post this turned i to a goat debate where is @ItsSherlock
I donât discredit your achievements and do think youâve a fair claim of being called the best but no, pvp wasnât harder back then than it is now.



